BNS s. 103: Punishment for murder
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC s. 302 (with s. 300)
- Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab 1958 SCR 1495 · 11 March 1958
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. Rayavarapu Punnayya & Another 1977 (1) SCR 601 · 15 September 1976
- Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab 1983 (1) SCR 145 · 9 May 1980
- Machhi Singh and Others v. State of Punjab 1983 (3) SCR 413 · 20 July 1983
- Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh 2025 INSC 577 · 28 April 2025
BNS s. 105: Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC s. 304 (with s. 299)
- Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh [2006] Supp. 4 SCR 633 · 18 August 2006
- Rampal Singh v. State of U.P. (2012) 8 SCC 289 · 24 July 2012
- Chenda @ Chanda Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 1285 of 2013, decided 27.08.2013 · 27 August 2013
- Stalin v. State represented by the Inspector of Police Criminal Appeal No. 577 of 2020, decided 09.09.2020 · 9 September 2020
- Anbazhagan v. State represented by the Inspector of Police 2023 INSC 632 · 20 July 2023
BNS s. 80: Dowry death
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC s. 304B (with Evidence Act s. 113B)
- Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2015) 6 SCC 477 · 26 February 2015
- Mahesh Kumar v. State of Haryana Criminal Appeal No. 1042 of 2012, decided 7 August 2019 (no reporter citation on the official copy) · 7 August 2019
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Jogendra Criminal Appeal No. 190 of 2012, decided 11 January 2022 (no reporter citation on the official copy) · 11 January 2022
- Paranagouda v. State of Karnataka 2023 INSC 933 · 19 October 2023
- State of U.P. v. Ajmal Beg 2025 INSC 1435 · 15 December 2025
BNS s. 85-86: Cruelty by husband or his relatives
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC s. 498A
- Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 · 2 July 2014
- Achin Gupta v. State of Haryana 2024 INSC 369 · 3 May 2024
- Dara Lakshmi Narayana v. State of Telangana 2024 INSC 953 · 10 December 2024
- Dr. Lokesh B.H. v. State of Karnataka 2026 INSC 784 · 3 August 2026
BNS s. 318: Cheating
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC ss. 415-420
- Ram Jas v. State of U.P. 1971 SCR (2) 178 · 11 September 1970
- Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. Criminal Appeal No. 834 of 2002, decided 20 July 2006 · 20 July 2006
- M.N.G. Bharateesh Reddy v. Ramesh Ranganathan Criminal Appeal No. 1273 of 2022, decided 18 August 2022 · 18 August 2022
- Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 626 · 23 August 2024
- Manish v. State of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 430 · 2 April 2025
- Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar 2000 (2) SCR 859 · 31 March 2000
BNS s. 316: Criminal breach of trust
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: IPC ss. 405-409
- R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration 1963 SCR (1) 253 · 5 April 1962
- Velji Raghavji Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1965 SCR (2) 429 · 11 December 1964
- Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar 1985 SCR (3) 191 · 12 March 1985
- M.N.G. Bharateesh Reddy v. Ramesh Ranganathan Criminal Appeal No. 1273 of 2022 (decided 18 August 2022; no neutral citation printed on the official copy) · 18 August 2022
- Sachin Garg v. State of U.P. 2024 INSC 72 · 30 January 2024
BNS s. 69: Sexual intercourse by deceitful means, including a false promise to marry
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier law: No separate IPC section (see IPC ss. 375 and 90)
- Uday v. State of Karnataka [2003] 2 SCR 231 · 19 February 2003
- Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana [2013] 6 SCR 544 · 20 May 2013
- Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra [2019] 11 SCR 423 · 21 August 2019
- Naim Ahamed v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2023] 1 SCR 1061 · 30 January 2023
- Mahesh Damu Khare v. State of Maharashtra 2024 INSC 897 · 26 November 2024
- Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh 2026 INSC 124 · 5 February 2026
- Kunal Rameshbhai Kalyani v. State of Gujarat 2026 INSC 987 · 7 September 2026
Headnotes are extracts from the Court's own judgments, selected by The Daily Bench for convenience. The selection is not part of the judgments, is not a law report and should not be cited. Rely on the official judgment.