Subscribe

Topic

Quashing Of Proceedings

2 judgments · all topics

AP High Court ·21 Sep 2026 ·Criminal Law

AP High Court quashes prohibition case against a 72-year-old jaggery merchant, following its earlier rulings on black jaggery

The question: Can proceedings under the prohibition law be sustained over transport or trade in black jaggery?

A 72-year-old jaggery merchant from Guntakal asked the High Court to quash a case against him under the A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2020 and the Gur (Regulation of Use) Order, 1968. His counsel argued that he had no link to the allegations beyond a co-accused's confession, and the Assistant Public Prosecutor accepted that the issue was already settled by earlier High Court orders.

Allowed CRLP/8291/2026

Telangana HC: A Magistrate must apply his mind before taking cognizance; cryptic docket order summoning an accused quashed

The question: What must a Magistrate record before taking cognizance and issuing summons to an accused?

An accused challenged a Magistrate's one-line docket order of 18 May 2026, in a Kukatpally court, that took cognizance and issued summons without recording any satisfaction. The Additional Public Prosecutor did not oppose the challenge. The High Court quashed the order and sent the matter back to the Magistrate to take cognizance afresh.

Disposed of CRLP/13550/2026